Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

So 1.3 patch = Ghosting only?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • So 1.3 patch = Ghosting only?

    Well I read the funny nerf thread that dalai posted and I realised that we wont be able to the guards even when we are at a difficult position... that means only ghosting? I have no problem with that just curious

    so no more and :swordthi: huh? k00L I didnt like the second 1 anyway
    "What'll we do tonight, RaughingLat?"
    "Same thing we do every night, Granky, try to take over the world."

  • #2
    Nah, the blackjack has been made less of a mass destruction weapon, that's about it. They still can use it, but it will be less useful.
    JM

    Comment


    • #3
      YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH

      Wo0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0oHo0o0o 0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o
      On demand this signature has been changed. I hope nobody was insulted or got harmed due to my signature. If this is the case, I'm fully responsible for the harm that was done. Do you feel harmed or you simply want a listening ear?

      Call 0900-PHAE

      Comment


      • #4
        No, what they do is making it more difficult to use IN COMBAT, which is where you should not be allowed to use it. Blackjack is meant to eliminate unaware guards, and with the patch you will be able to KO them anyways, since you'll have the 2 tenths of a second longer required to properly lean/position yourself in the rear of the guard. It won't stop combat blackjacking but it will sure move the game quite a bit towards what the builders intended it to be, so i say yay for them!.
        As a side note, the new thief transparency system is going to be the major change in the patch, IMO, because you WILL have trouble seeing people 30% visible only, which again will give thieves a very big edge.

        I'm soooo looking forward this patch!

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Mr.K.
          I'm soooo looking forward this patch!
          Same as I am!

          Comment


          • #6
            The new thief transparency hasn't had that much of an effect actually. Most of the maps have hard shadows inside which a thief is 0% and outside is 100% so you don't notice it much...

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Dalai
              The new thief transparency hasn't had that much of an effect actually. Most of the maps have hard shadows inside which a thief is 0% and outside is 100% so you don't notice it much...
              How about thieves running in shadows? Are they less visible than before?

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by PhaeThorn
                YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH

                Wo0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0oHo0o0o 0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o
                And what's up with you anyway? I never see you play.

                Comment


                • #9
                  dont worry it's just he's realised how lousy he is at playing so got dragged into doing stuff for me (aka Phae Bashing)
                  [E.D.G] "Eaves Droppers Guild - we're on the edge."

                  All New Thievery-O's!

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Mr.K.
                    No, what they do is making it more difficult to use IN COMBAT, which is where you should not be allowed to use it. Blackjack is meant to eliminate unaware guards, and with the patch you will be able to KO them anyways, since you'll have the 2 tenths of a second longer required to properly lean/position yourself in the rear of the guard. It won't stop combat blackjacking but it will sure move the game quite a bit towards what the builders intended it to be, so i say yay for them!.
                    As a side note, the new thief transparency system is going to be the major change in the patch, IMO, because you WILL have trouble seeing people 30% visible only, which again will give thieves a very big edge.

                    I'm soooo looking forward this patch!
                    Nice then Why this 1.3 is so late? I m not in hurry j/k :grin:
                    "What'll we do tonight, RaughingLat?"
                    "Same thing we do every night, Granky, try to take over the world."

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by -=V12US=-
                      How about thieves running in shadows? Are they less visible than before?
                      Even if they're mostly translucent , you will still see a moving shape... so they'll have to stop to be undetectable , like now. There's something cool with motion detecting... it revives your predator instinct :twisted:

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Dalai
                        The new thief transparency hasn't had that much of an effect actually. Most of the maps have hard shadows inside which a thief is 0% and outside is 100% so you don't notice it much...
                        Well, sounds like the maps need a few modifications then...

                        And I sure hope the BJ gets a good nerfing; I never knew there were so many shadows...
                        TCO – Retired
                        Former TCO Head of Intelligence – Retired

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Are my scouting orbs in 1.3? Please, please, please, please?

                          http://www.thieveryut.com/bb/viewtopic.php?t=215

                          Thought for the day: Beware of Gods who do not laugh

                          http://bobthemad.8m.com/

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by BobTheMad
                            Are my scouting orbs in 1.3? Please, please, please, please?
                            Yes.
                            "Garlisk's got a lov-el-y bunch of coconuts."

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              "Garlisk's got a lov-el-y bunch of coconuts."

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X