Turfwars Rule Question re Skirmishing

[Adrock]

I was just looking over the rules again, and a question regarding Skirmishing came to mind.

Lets say GuildA decides they want to try to claim (Takeover) Payback from the unclaimed. GuildB challenges the Takeover, and supplies Flats as the Tiebreaker.

GuildB loses both matches. Does GuildA then get TWO maps? Payback and Flats?

(map names were used as an example)

[Kiech Bepho]

Yes. So you need to be very sure that you can win. And bring a VERY defendable tiebreaker map. If you want a map from the 'unclaimed' pile, you really should have someone waiting for the second it is approved to announce a takeover.

[Adrock]

IMO that is too much. 2 Maps from having a chance to get a FREE map seems too much compensation..

[Kiech Bepho]

It's a little harsh. But not a bad rule.

For a change, maybe something like this: The guild who annonced the takeover must win all three games to take the skirmish announcers map.

Kiech

[LaughingRat]

Looking it over, the rules are vague on Adrock's question. Thanks for bringing that to my attention.

*adds that to the list of upcoming revisions*

[DeepQantas]

Hm. See my thoughts in Th-Payback thread for camping to be the first claimant.


Anyway, how would you find the idea that if the challenging guild loses, the map doesn't go to the claimant, but to the unclaimed pool? The pool does seem a bit empty at times.